Nº. 1 of  2

Preservation Lovin'

the inner workings of a historic preservationist as she courageously tries to save buildings, neighborhoods, and communities by showing the inner beauty and wisdom that lies within our physical environment

Posts tagged Preservation:

Neon Museum - Las Vegas, Nevada (Photos Courtesy of Author)

My final year of my masters program in Historic Preservation. The only thing that is stopping me from getting my diploma (other than completing all of my courses/credits) is the ultimate thesis. Feelings of anxiety has overcome myself and the majority of my peers. However, it is only through my love and passion of my thesis topic I know that I have the courage to complete this ultimate dissertation that may perhaps (as my professors have scared us to death) define my burgeoning years in the historic preservation field. This is definitely not for the faint in heart!

Okay, perhaps I am over-dramatizing this…

Let’s get back down to earth. For all those that are inclined, for my thesis I venture to preserve the neon signs of Las Vegas! I plan to do this by:

  • Investigating the existing conditions of signs;
  • Digging through the history of timeless Las Vegas neon signs to elucidate how their appearance has evolved over the years;
  • Analyzing how these signs age and deteriorate;
  • Researching different conservation techniques to preserve the paint, metal, and neon glass of these amazing sculptures;
  • And proposing a plan on how best to conserve these relics of Las Vegas yesteryear. 
  • (If there is anything that I am leaving off, please let me know.)

If you have any information, recommendations, comments, concerns, contacts, ANYTHING that can help me with my thesis, PLEASE let me know! (Even if its to drop an opinion on how you think the sign should be preserved.)

You can reply to this post, make a comment in the disqus thread (found on comments and requests link at the bottom of each post), the ‘ask me anything’ link at the bottom of the page, or shoot me an email at the email address found in my about page.

Oh and please reblog this to help spread the support of preserving Las Vegas Neon Signs! Thanks everyone! :)

Comments
From their website:

“The Boston Preservation Alliance is a nonprofit organization that  protects and improves the quality of Boston’s distinct architectural  heritage. Through advocacy and education, we bring people and  organizations together to influence the future of Boston’s historic  buildings, landscapes and communities.”

Preservation accomplishments include the United Shoe Machinery Corporation Building (1930), Old Exchange Building (1889), Charles Street Jail (1851), Paramount Theatre (1932), Opera House (1928), and Fenway Park (1912)

From their website:

“The Boston Preservation Alliance is a nonprofit organization that protects and improves the quality of Boston’s distinct architectural heritage. Through advocacy and education, we bring people and organizations together to influence the future of Boston’s historic buildings, landscapes and communities.”

Preservation accomplishments include the United Shoe Machinery Corporation Building (1930), Old Exchange Building (1889), Charles Street Jail (1851), Paramount Theatre (1932), Opera House (1928), and Fenway Park (1912)

Comments

Georgia State Tax Incentive Programs

From Georgia Historic Preservation Office Website:

Historic residential and commercial properties are eligible to participate in both programs.  The property must be a “certified structure,” which means it must be listed in the National/Georgia Register(s) of Historic Places.  The Historic Preservation Division must certify the rehabilitation.

The Georgia Preferential Property Tax Assessment Program for Rehabilitated Historic Property allows eligible participants to apply for an 8-year property tax assessment freeze.  The Georgia Preferential Property Tax Assessment Program fact sheet provides an overview of the state tax abatement program and those properties that may be eligible to apply for this incentive.

The Georgia State Income Tax Credit Program for Rehabilitated Historic Property allows eligible participants to apply for a state income tax credit equaling 25% of qualifying rehabilitation expenses capped at $100,000 for personal, residential properties, and $300,000 for income-producing properties.  The Georgia State Income Tax Credit Program fact sheet  provides an overview of the state income tax credit program and those properties that may be eligible to apply for this incentive.”

If you would like to find out whether your state offers tax incentive programs, be sure to speak with your historic preservation representative.

Comments

beesonthewhatnow:

This effort is being led by a coalition of organizations that includes DoCoMoMo, Landmarks Illinois, The National Trust for Historic Preservation, and Preservation Chicago.Take Action - please voice your support for the landmark protection of Goldberg’s Modern Masterpiece.

WRITE A LETTER to Alderman Brendan Reilly, Office of the 42nd Ward, 325 W. Huron St., Suite 150, Chicago, IL 60654 or email: office@ward42chicago.com

Our mission is the preservation and reuse of this iconic—and now threatened—Chicago structure, designed by noted architect Bertrand Goldberg in 1974. Coalition members include DoCoMoMo, Landmarks Illinois, National Trust, and Preservation Chicago.http://www.landmarks.org
http://www.preservationchicago.org

Pass this along!

Comments

…let us, while waiting for new monument, preserve the ancient monuments.

—Victor Hugo

Comments

Theory Tuesday: Preservation Quotes

Today I will be posting a spread of historic preservation quotes. Enjoy!

Comments

Traveling Thursday: Portland, Oregon

Traveling Thursday: A new series that looks at historic architecture and preservation efforts on a particular city. This week is

Portland, Oregon

From Wikipedia:

The site of the future city of Portland, Oregon, was known to American, Canadian, and British traders, trappers and settlers of the 1830s and early 1840s as “The Clearing,” a small stopping place along the west bank of the Willamette River used by travelers en route between Oregon City and Fort Vancouver. As early as 1840, Massachusetts sea captain John Couch logged an encouraging assessment of the river’s depth adjacent to The Clearing, noting its promise of accommodating large ocean-going vessels, which could not ordinarily travel up-river as far as Oregon City, the largest Oregon settlement at the time. In 1843, Tennessee pioneer William Overton and Asa Lovejoy, a lawyer from Boston, Massachusetts, filed a 640-acre (2.6 km²) land claim with Oregon’s provisional government that encompassed The Clearing and nearby waterfront and timber land. Legend has it that Overton had prior rights to the land but lacked funds, so he agreed to split the claim with Lovejoy, who paid the 25-cent filing fee.

Portland in 1853

Bored with clearing trees and building roads, Overton sold his half of the claim to Francis W. Pettygrove of Portland, Maine, in 1845. When it came time to name their new town, Pettygrove and Lovejoy both had the same idea: to name it after his home town. They flipped a coin to decide, and Pettygrove won. On November 1, 1846, Lovejoy sold his half of the land claim to Benjamin Stark, as well as his half-interest in a herd of cattle for $1,215.[1]

Three years later, Pettygrove had lost interest in Portland and become enamored with the California Gold Rush. On September 22, 1848, he sold the entire townsite, save only for 64 sold lots and two blocks each for himself and Stark, to Daniel H. Lownsdale, a tanner. Although Stark owned fully half of the townsite, Pettygrove “largely ignor[ed] Stark’s interest”, in part because Stark was on the east coast with no immediate plans to return to Oregon. Lownsdale paid for the site with $5,000 in leather, which Pettygrove presumably resold in San Francisco for a large profit.[1]

On March 30, 1849, Lownsdale split the Portland claim with Stephen Coffin, who paid $6,000 for his half. By August 1849, Captain John Couch and Stark were pressuring Lownsdale and Coffin for Stark’s half of the claim; Stark had been absent, but was using the claim as equity in a East Coast-California shipping business with the Sherman Brothers of New York.[1]

In December 1849, William W. Chapman bought what he believed was a third of the overall claim for $26,666, plus his provision of free legal services for the partnership. In January 1850, Lownsdale had to travel to San Francisco to negotiate on the land claim with Stark, leaving Chapman with power of attorney. Stark and Lownsdale came to an agreement on March 1, 1850, which gave to Stark the land north of Stark Street and about $3,000 from land already sold in this area. This settlement reduced the size of Chapman’s claim by approximately 10%. Lownsdale returned to Portland in April 1850, where the terms were presented to an unwilling Chapman and Coffin, but who agreed after negotiations with Couch. While Lownsdale was gone, Chapman had given himself block 81 on the waterfront and sold all of the lots on it, and this block was included in the Stark settlement area. Couch’s negotiations excluded this property from Stark’s claim, allowing Chapman to retain the profits on the lot.[1]

Portland existed in the shadow of Oregon City, the territorial capital 12 miles (19 km) upstream at Willamette Falls. However, Portland’s location at the Willamette’s confluence with the Columbia River, accessible to deep-draft vessels, gave it a key advantage over its older peer. It also triumphed over early rivals such as Milwaukie and Linnton. In its first census in 1850, the city’s population was 821 and, like many frontier towns, was predominantly male, with 653 male whites, 164 female whites and four “free colored” individuals. It was already the largest settlement in the Pacific Northwest, and while it could boast about its trading houses, hotels and even a newspaper—the Weekly Oregonian—it was still very much a frontier village, derided by outsiders as “Stumptown” and “Mudtown.” It was a place where “stumps from fallen firs lay scattered dangerously about Front and First Streets … humans and animals, carts and wagons slogged through a sludge of mud and water … sidewalks often disappeared during spring floods.”[1]

Comments

Preserving Disneyland

*Note: Get involved and answer! My following posts of the day will question the validity of preserving Disneyland.

My last reblog on Walt Disney trademarking Mickey Mouse got me thinking. The whole franchise of Walt Disney has become a dear part of my childhood, as well as many people across the world. Disney created a fantastical world and Disneyland became the very antithesis of that place. Minus the extraordinary monetary expense of this theme park that my parents would have to shell out not only for the entrance fees, but also for the food and gift shop toys, Disneyland was a place where dreams came true for any wide-eyed child.

With such strong life connections associated to a place, while at the same time being a commercial enterprise, Is it possible to historically preserve Disneyland? And what are the reasons to (or not to) preserve it?

Comments
Nº. 1 of  2